Caesarean section delivery and childhood obesity in a British longitudinal cohort study

dc.contributor.authorMasukume, Gwinyai
dc.contributor.authorKhashan, Ali S.
dc.contributor.authorMorton, Susan M. B.
dc.contributor.authorBaker, Philip N.
dc.contributor.authorKenny, Louise C.
dc.contributor.authorMcCarthy, Fergus P.
dc.contributor.funderScience Foundation Irelanden
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-04T10:54:16Z
dc.date.available2019-12-04T10:54:16Z
dc.date.issued2019-10-30
dc.description.abstractBackground: Several studies reported an association between Caesarean section (CS) birth and childhood obesity. However, there are several limitations in the current literature. These include an inability to distinguish between planned and emergency CS, small study sample sizes and not adjusting for pre-pregnancy body-mass-index (BMI). We examined the association between CS delivery and childhood obesity using the United Kingdom Millennium Cohort Study (MCS). Methods: Mother-infant pairs were recruited into the MCS. Use of sampling weights ensured the sample was representative of the population. The exposure was categorised as normal vaginal delivery (VD) [reference], assisted VD, planned CS and emergency CS. Childhood obesity prevalence, at age three, five, seven, eleven and fourteen years was calculated using the International Obesity Taskforce criteria. Mixed-effects linear regression models were fitted with associations adjusted for several potential confounders like maternal age, pre-pregnancy BMI, education and infant macrosomia. Linear regression models were fitted evaluating body fat percentage (BF%), at age seven and fourteen years. Results: Of the 18,116 infants, 3872 (21.4%) were delivered by CS; 9.2% by planned CS. Obesity prevalence was 5.4%, 5.7%, 6.5%, 7.1% and 7.6% at age three, five, seven, eleven and fourteen years respectively. The mixed-effects linear regression model showed no association between planned (adjusted mean difference = 0.00; [95% confidence interval (CI) -0.10; 0.10], p-value = 0.97) or emergency CS (adjusted mean difference = 0.08; [95% CI -0.01; 0.17], p-value = 0.09) and child BMI. At age seven years, there was no association between planned CS and BF% (adjusted mean difference = 0.13; [95% CI -0.23; 0.49]); there was no association at age fourteen years. Conclusions: Infants born by planned CS did not have a significantly higher BMI or BF% compared to those born by normal VD. This may suggest that the association, described in the literature, could be due to the indications/reasons for CS birth or residual confounding.en
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.description.versionPublished Versionen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.articleide0223856en
dc.identifier.citationMasukume, G., Khashan, A. S., Morton, S. M. B., Baker, P. N., Kenny, L. C. and McCarthy, F. P. (2019) 'Caesarean section delivery and childhood obesity in a British longitudinal cohort study', PLOS ONE, 14(10), e0223856. (13pp.) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223856en
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0223856en
dc.identifier.eissn1932-6203
dc.identifier.endpage13en
dc.identifier.issued10en
dc.identifier.journaltitlePLOS ONEen
dc.identifier.startpage1en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10468/9315
dc.identifier.volume13en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherPublic Library of Scienceen
dc.relation.projectinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/SFI/SFI Research Centres/12/RC/2272/IE/Irish Centre for Fetal and Neonatal Translational Research (INFANT)/en
dc.rights©2019 Masukume et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.en
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en
dc.subjectCaesarean section (CS)en
dc.subjectChildhood obesityen
dc.subjectBritainen
dc.titleCaesarean section delivery and childhood obesity in a British longitudinal cohort studyen
dc.typeArticle (peer-reviewed)en
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 5 of 10
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
journal.pone.0223856.pdf
Size:
632.24 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
journal.pone.0223856.s001.pdf
Size:
230.24 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Supplementary file 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
journal.pone.0223856.s002.pdf
Size:
346.96 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Supplementary file 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
journal.pone.0223856.s003.pdf
Size:
304.19 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Supplementary file 3
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
journal.pone.0223856.s004.pdf
Size:
300.6 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Supplementary file 4
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: