The impact of intervention dose form on oral language outcomes for children with developmental language disorder

dc.check.date2022-01-02
dc.check.infoAccess to this article is restricted until 6 months after publication by request of the publisher.en
dc.contributor.authorFrizelle, Pauline
dc.contributor.authorTolonen, Anna-Kaisa
dc.contributor.authorTulip, Josie
dc.contributor.authorMurphy, Carol-Anne
dc.contributor.authorSaldana, David
dc.contributor.authorMcKean, Cristina
dc.contributor.funderEuropean Cooperation in Science and Technologyen
dc.contributor.funderEuropean Commissionen
dc.contributor.funderNational Health and Medical Research Councilen
dc.contributor.funderMurdoch Children's Research Instituteen
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-03T15:59:15Z
dc.date.available2021-08-03T15:59:15Z
dc.date.issued2021-07-02
dc.date.updated2021-08-03T15:43:29Z
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The aim of this study was to extract key learning from intervention studies in which qualitative aspects of dosage, dose form, have been examined for children with developmental language disorder (DLD)—in vocabulary, morphosyntax, and phonology domains. This research paper emerged from a pair of systematic reviews, aiming to synthesize available evidence regarding qualitative and quantitative aspects of dosage. While quantitative aspects had been experimentally manipulated, the available evidence for dose form (tasks or activities within which teaching episodes are delivered) was less definitive. Despite this, the review uncovered insights of value to DLD research. Method: A preregistered systematic review (PROSPERO ID: CRD42017076663) adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines was completed. Included papers were quasi-experimental, randomized controlled trial, or cohort analytic studies, published in any language between January 2006 and May 2019; oral language interventions with vocabulary, morphosyntax, or phonology outcomes; and participants with DLD (M = 3–18 years). The intention was to include papers in which dose form was experimentally manipulated or statistically analyzed, while quantitative dosage aspects were controlled, such that definitive conclusions about optimal dose form could be drawn and gaps in the evidence identified. Results: Two hundred and twenty-four papers met the above inclusion criteria; 27 focused on dose form. No study controlled for all quantitative aspects of dosage such that we could effectively address our original research questions. Despite this, key points of learning emerged with implications for future research. Conclusions: There is tentative evidence of advantages for explicit over implicit instruction and of the benefits of variability in input, elicited production, and gestural and other visual supports. With careful design of dose form, there is potential to design more efficient interventions. Speech-language pathology research would benefit from an agreed taxonomy of dose form components and standardized reporting of intervention studies, to enable cross-study comparisons and a systematic accrual of knowledge to identify optimal dose form for clinical application.en
dc.description.sponsorshipEuropean Cooperation in Science Technology, COST (Cost Action IS1406 network entitled: Enhancing children's oral language skills across Europe and beyond - a collaboration focusing on interventions for children with difficulties learning their first language); European Union (Grant: COST 106/14)); National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia (NHMRC fellowship); Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Australia (Centre of Research Excellence in Child Language (1023493))en
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.description.versionAccepted Versionen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.citationFrizelle, P., Tolonen, A.-K., Tulip, J., Murphy, C.-A., Saldana, D. and McKean, C. (2021) 'The Impact of Intervention Dose Form on Oral Language Outcomes for Children With Developmental Language Disorder', Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, doi: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-20-00734en
dc.identifier.doi10.1044/2021_JSLHR-20-00734en
dc.identifier.endpage70en
dc.identifier.issn1092-4388
dc.identifier.journaltitleJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Researchen
dc.identifier.startpage1en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10468/11635
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherAmerican Speech-Language-Hearing Association, ASHAen
dc.relation.urihttps://pubs.asha.org/doi/abs/10.1044/2021_JSLHR-20-00734
dc.rights© 2021 American Speech-Language-Hearing Associationen
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en
dc.subjectDevelopmental language disorder (DLD)en
dc.subjectIntervention studiesen
dc.subjectSpeech-language pathology researchen
dc.subjectDose formen
dc.subjectDosageen
dc.subjectSystematic reviewsen
dc.titleThe impact of intervention dose form on oral language outcomes for children with developmental language disorderen
dc.typeArticle (peer-reviewed)en
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
DoseFormacceptedcopy.pdf
Size:
2.86 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Accepted version
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: