How do participants feel about the ethics of rich false memory studies?

Murphy, Gillian; Maher, Julie; Ballantyne, Lisa; Barrett, Elizabeth; Cowman, Conor S.; Dawson, Caroline A.; Huston, Charlotte; Ryan, Katie M.; Greene, Ciara M.

How do participants feel about the ethics of rich false memory studies?

cbn

Date

2023-01-23

Authors

Murphy, Gillian

Maher, Julie

Ballantyne, Lisa

Barrett, Elizabeth

Cowman, Conor S.

Dawson, Caroline A.

Huston, Charlotte

Ryan, Katie M.

Greene, Ciara M.

Publisher

Taylor and Francis

Published Version

10.1080/09658211.2023.2170417

Abstract

Deception is often a necessity in rich false memory studies, but is this deception acceptable to participants? In the current study, we followed up with 175 participants who had taken part in a replication of the Lost in the Mall childhood false memory study (Loftus & Pickrell, 1995), as either a research subject or a familial informant. We found that both participants and informants were generally very positive about their experience, did not regret taking part and found the deceptive methods acceptable. Importantly, the vast majority reported that they would still have taken part had they known the true objectives from the beginning. Participants also reported learning something interesting about memory and enjoying the nostalgia and family discussions that were prompted by the study. We would encourage other researchers to assess the ethical implications of false memory research paradigms and to incorporate the valuable feedback from participants and informants.

Keywords

Memory , False memory , Ethics , Metascience , Deception

Citation

Murphy, G., Maher, J., Ballantyne, L., Barrett, E., Cowman, C.S., Dawson, C.A., Huston, C., Ryan, K.M. and Greene, C.M. (2023) ‘How do participants feel about the ethics of rich false memory studies?’, Memory, 31(4), pp. 474–481. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2023.2170417.