How does psychiatric diagnosis and the language of ‘disorder’ shape humanistic counselling practice? A qualitative reflexive thematic analysis

Simple item page
dc.check.date2026-09-12en
dc.check.infoAccess to this article is restricted until 12 months after publication by request of the publisheren
dc.contributor.authorMorgan, Ashleyen
dc.contributor.authorMcCoy, Stephenen
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-20T13:17:41Z
dc.date.available2025-10-20T13:17:41Z
dc.date.issued2025-09-12en
dc.description.abstractBackground: Humanistic approaches to counselling traditionally adopt a nonpathologising stance whereby distress is understood in the context of client subjectivity, rather than standardised diagnostic criteria; yet medicalised language and labels increasingly accompany clients into the counselling room and frame how many people understand their experience. Existing research exploring the influence of psychiatric discourse upon attitudes and approaches of mental health professionals does not include humanistic counselling professionals, despite clear tensions between humanistic and psychiatric paradigms. This study sought to address this gap by exploring the interplay between humanistic counselling practice and psychiatric discourse through the lived experiences of humanistic counselling professionals in Ireland. Method: Using reflective thematic analysis, this qualitative study conducted semi-structured interviews to explore the attitudes and approaches of (N = 7) humanistic counselling professionals in Ireland towards psychiatric discourse and working with clients given a psychiatric diagnosis. This research was explored through the lens of critical realism. Findings: Four themes are reported in this paper: (i) therapist attitudes, (ii) therapeutic approach, (iii) training, knowledge and understanding, and (iv) therapist resistance to psychiatric discourse. Evidence of incongruent, suspicious and pessimistic attitudes among participants towards clients presenting with a psychiatric diagnosis was identified within the data. These attitudes may be shaped by stigma and stereotypes associated with a client's diagnosis. Participants described directive and cautious approaches to working with clients diagnosed with a ‘disorder’, and at times appeared to prioritise management over the meaning of ‘symptoms’. Counselling education may play a role in counsellors' attitudes and approaches to psychiatric discourse. Attempts to resist the dominance of psychiatric discourse in practice were evident throughout the data. Conclusion: Findings of this study suggest that psychiatric language may threaten the integrity of humanistic counselling practice through incongruent attitudes, focus on ‘fixing’ and pessimism among therapists when clients are viewed in terms of psychiatric ‘disorder’. The results of this paper invite therapists to reflect critically upon their relationship with psychiatric discourse. This includes consideration of the influence of any taken-for-granted knowledge of psychiatric ‘disorder’ and how this may shape their attitudes and approach to counselling practice. Further research might examine the hidden assumptions that therapists hold with regard to psychiatric discourse.en
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.description.versionAccepted Versionen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.articleide70038en
dc.identifier.citationMorgan, A., and McCoy, S. (2025) 'How does psychiatric diagnosis and the language of ‘disorder’ shape humanistic counselling practice? A qualitative reflexive thematic analysis', Counselling and Psychotherapy Research 25(3), e70038 (15pp). https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.70038en
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/capr.70038en
dc.identifier.eissn1746-1405en
dc.identifier.endpage15en
dc.identifier.issn1473-3145en
dc.identifier.issued3en
dc.identifier.journaltitleCounselling and Psychotherapy Researchen
dc.identifier.startpage1en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10468/18067
dc.identifier.volume25en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Ltd.en
dc.relation.ispartofCounselling and Psychotherapy Researchen
dc.rights© 2025, British Association for Counselling and Psychotherapy. This is the accepted version of the following item: Morgan, A., and McCoy, S. (2025) 'How does psychiatric diagnosis and the language of ‘disorder’ shape humanistic counselling practice? A qualitative reflexive thematic analysis', Counselling and Psychotherapy Research 25(3), e70038 (15pp), which has been published in final form at: https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.70038 This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions.en
dc.subjectAttitudesen
dc.subjectCounselling and psychotherapyen
dc.subjectDiagnosisen
dc.subjectPsychiatryen
dc.subjectReflexivityen
dc.subjectStigmaen
dc.titleHow does psychiatric diagnosis and the language of ‘disorder’ shape humanistic counselling practice? A qualitative reflexive thematic analysisen
dc.typeArticle (peer-reviewed)en
dc.typejournal-articleen
oaire.citation.issue3en
oaire.citation.volume25en
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Copy of Manuscript Version 2 following peer review.pdf
Size:
467.25 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Accepted Version
Download
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Copy of Manuscript Version 2 following peer review.docx
Size:
418.64 KB
Format:
Microsoft Word XML
Description:
Authors' original with comments visible.
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Psychiatry - Journal Articles