Size does matter: city scale and the asymmetries of climate change adaptation in three coastal towns

dc.contributor.authorPaterson, Shona K.
dc.contributor.authorPelling, Mark
dc.contributor.authorNunes, Lucí Hidalgo
dc.contributor.authorde Araújo Moreira, Fabiano
dc.contributor.authorGuida, Kristen
dc.contributor.authorMarengo, Jose Antonio
dc.contributor.funderNational Science Foundationen
dc.contributor.funderNatural Environment Research Councilen
dc.contributor.funderFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Pauloen
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-15T09:44:41Z
dc.date.available2017-03-15T09:44:41Z
dc.date.issued2016-03-06
dc.description.abstractGlobally, it is smaller urban settlements that are growing most rapidly, are most constrained in terms of adaptive capacity but increasingly looked to for delivering local urban resilience. Data from three smaller coastal cities and their wider regional governance systems in Florida, US; West Sussex, UK and São Paulo, Brazil are used to compare the influence of scale and sector on city adaptive capacity. These tensions are described through the lens of the Adaptive Capacity Index (ACI) approach. The ACI is built from structuration theory and presents an alternative to social-ecological systems framing of analysis on adaptation. Structuration articulates the interaction of agency and structure and the intervening role played by institutions on information flow, in shaping adaptive capacity and outcomes. The ACI approach reveals inequalities in adaptive capacity to be greater across scale than across government, private and civil society sector capacity in each study area. This has implications for adaptation research both by reinforcing the importance of scale and demonstrating the utility of structuration theory as a framework for understanding the social dynamics underpinning adaptive capacity; and policy relevance, in particular considering the redistribution of decision-making power across scale and/or compensatory mechanisms, especially for lower scale actors, who increasingly carry the costs for enacting resilience planning in cities.en
dc.description.sponsorshipMetropole Project (METROPOLE: An Integrated Framework to Analyze Local Decision Making and Adaptive Capacity to Large-Scale Environmental Change) led by Frank Muller-Karger, supported by the Belmont Forum with national funding from NERC (NE/L008963/1), NSF (ICER 1342969) and FAPESP (G8MUREFU3FP-2201-040, Fapesp Proc. 12/51876-0 and 14/14598-8).en
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.description.versionPublished Versionen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.citationPaterson, S. K., Pelling, M., Nunes, L. H., de Araújo Moreira, F., Guida, K. and Marengo, J. A. (2017) 'Size does matter: City scale and the asymmetries of climate change adaptation in three coastal towns', Geoforum, 81, pp. 109-119. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.02.014en
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.02.014
dc.identifier.endpage119en
dc.identifier.issn0016-7185
dc.identifier.journaltitleGeoforumen
dc.identifier.startpage109en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10468/3779
dc.identifier.volume81en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherElsevieren
dc.rights© 2017 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Open Access funded by Natural Environment Research Council. Under a Creative Commons licenseen
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en
dc.subjectAdaptive capacityen
dc.subjectStructuration Scaleen
dc.subjectUrbanen
dc.subjectBrazilen
dc.subjectUSAen
dc.subjectUKen
dc.subjectAdaptive capacity indexen
dc.titleSize does matter: city scale and the asymmetries of climate change adaptation in three coastal townsen
dc.typeArticle (peer-reviewed)en
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2668.pdf
Size:
1.14 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published Version
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: