A randomised controlled study on the use of finishing and polishing systems on different resin composites using 3D contact optical profilometry and scanning electron microscopy

dc.contributor.authorDaud, Alaa
dc.contributor.authorGray, Gordon
dc.contributor.authorLynch, Christopher D.
dc.contributor.authorWilson, Nairn H. F.
dc.contributor.authorBlum, Igor R.
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-31T12:03:42Z
dc.date.available2018-01-31T12:03:42Z
dc.date.issued2018-01-31
dc.date.updated2018-01-31T11:54:55Z
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate theeffects of different finishing and polishing techniques on the surface roughness of microhybrid and nanofilled resin composites. Methods: The resin composites included were Filtek Z250 (a universal microhybrid resin composite) and Filtek Supreme XTE (a universal nanofill resin composite). Ninety cylindrical-shaped specimens were prepared for each composite resin material. The polishing methods used included tungsten carbide bur (TC); diamond bur (Db); Sof-Lex discs (S); Enhance PoGo discs (PG); TC + S; Db + S; TC + PG; Db + PG. Polymerisation against a Mylar strip without finishing and polishing acted as the control group. Surface roughness was measured using a 3D contact optical profilometer and surface morphology was examined by scanning electron microscope examination. Results: The results showed that the Mylar-formed surfaces were smoothest for both composites. Finishing with the 20 μm diamond finishing bur caused significantly greater surface irregularity (P < 0.0001) and damage than finishing with the tungsten carbide finishing bur. The Enhance PoGo polishing system produced smoother surfaces than the Sof-Lex disc polishing system; this difference was statistically highly significant (P < 0.0001). Conclusion: For both composites, the Mylar-formed surfaces were smoothest. Where indicated clinically, finishing is better conducted using a tungsten carbide bur- rather than a diamond finishing bur. The Enhance PoGo system was found to produce a smoother surface finish than the Sof-Lex system. Clinical Significance: If finishing and polishing is required the use a tungsten carbide finishing bur followed by Enhance PoGo polishing may be found to result in the smoothest surface finish.en
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.description.versionAccepted Versionen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.citationDaud, A., Gray, G., Lynch, C. D., Wilson, N. H. F. and Blum, I. R. 'A randomised controlled study on the use of finishing and polishing systems on different resin composites using 3D contact optical profilometry and scanning electron microscopy', Journal of Dentistry, 71, pp. 25-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2018.01.008en
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jdent.2018.01.008
dc.identifier.endpage22en
dc.identifier.endpage30
dc.identifier.issn0300-5712
dc.identifier.journaltitleJournal of Dentistryen
dc.identifier.startpage1en
dc.identifier.startpage25
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10468/5353
dc.identifier.volume71
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherElsevieren
dc.relation.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0300571218300204
dc.rights© 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license.en
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en
dc.subjectResin compositeen
dc.subjectPolishing systemsen
dc.subjectSurface roughnessen
dc.titleA randomised controlled study on the use of finishing and polishing systems on different resin composites using 3D contact optical profilometry and scanning electron microscopyen
dc.typeArticle (peer-reviewed)en
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
4763.pdf
Size:
968.46 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Accepted version
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: