Response of neuronal populations to phase-locked stimulation: model-based predictions and validation

dc.contributor.authorMirkhani, Nimaen
dc.contributor.authorMcNamara, Colin G.en
dc.contributor.authorOliviers, Gasparden
dc.contributor.authorSharott, Andrewen
dc.contributor.authorDuchet, Benoiten
dc.contributor.authorBogacz, Rafalen
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-14T16:00:16Z
dc.date.available2025-05-14T16:00:16Z
dc.date.issued2025-04-09en
dc.description.abstractModulation of neuronal oscillations holds promise for the treatment of neurological disorders. Nonetheless, conventional stimulation in a continuous open-loop manner can lead to side effects and suboptimal efficiency. Closed-loop strategies such as phase-locked stimulation aim to address these shortcomings by offering a more targeted modulation. While theories have been developed to understand the neural response to stimulation, their predictions have not been thoroughly tested using experimental data. Using a mechanistic coupled oscillator model, we elaborate on two key predictions describing the response to stimulation as a function of the phase and amplitude of ongoing neural activity. To investigate these predictions, we analyze electrocorticogram recordings from a previously conducted study in parkinsonian rats and extract the corresponding phase and amplitude response curves. We demonstrate that the amplitude response to stimulation is strongly correlated to the derivative of the phase response (ρ > 0.8) in all animals except one, thereby validating a key model prediction. The second prediction postulates that the stimulation becomes ineffective when the network synchrony is high, a trend that appeared missing in the data. Our analysis explains this discrepancy by showing that the neural populations in parkinsonian rats did not reach the level of synchrony for which the theory would predict ineffective stimulation. Our results highlight the potential of fine-tuning stimulation paradigms informed by mathematical models that consider both the ongoing phase and amplitude of the targeted neural oscillation.en
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.description.versionPublished Versionen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.articleide2269242025en
dc.identifier.citationMirkhani, N., McNamara, C. G., Oliviers, G., Sharott, A., Duchet, B. and Bogacz, R. (2025) Response of neuronal populations to phase-locked stimulation: model-based predictions and validation', Journal of Neuroscience, 45(15), e2269242025 (12pp). https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2269-24.2025en
dc.identifier.doi10.1523/jneurosci.2269-24.2025en
dc.identifier.eissn1529-2401en
dc.identifier.endpage12en
dc.identifier.issn0270-6474en
dc.identifier.issued15en
dc.identifier.journaltitleJournal of Neuroscienceen
dc.identifier.startpage1en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10468/17496
dc.identifier.volume45en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherSociety for Neuroscienceen
dc.relation.ispartofThe Journal of Neuroscienceen
dc.rights© 2025, the Authors. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en
dc.subjectBrain oscillationsen
dc.subjectKuramoto modelen
dc.subjectParkinson’s diseaseen
dc.subjectPhase-locked stimulationen
dc.titleResponse of neuronal populations to phase-locked stimulation: model-based predictions and validationen
dc.typeArticle (peer-reviewed)en
dc.typejournal-articleen
oaire.citation.issue15en
oaire.citation.volume45en
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
e2269242025.full.pdf
Size:
3.55 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published Version
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: