Factors influencing the variation in GMS prescribing expenditure in Ireland

dc.contributor.authorConwayLenihan, Aisling
dc.contributor.authorAhern, S.
dc.contributor.authorMoore, Stephen
dc.contributor.authorCronin, Jodi
dc.contributor.authorWoods, Noel
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-14T14:21:29Z
dc.date.available2022-09-14T14:21:29Z
dc.date.issued2016-03-29
dc.date.updated2022-09-13T22:35:22Z
dc.description.abstractBackground: Pharmaceutical expenditure growth is a familiar feature in many Western health systems and is a real concern for policymakers. A state funded General Medical Services (GMS) scheme in Ireland experienced an increase in prescription expenditure of 414 % between 1998 and 2012. This paper seeks to explore the rationale for this growth by investigating the composition (Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) Group level 1 & 5) and drivers of GMS drug expenditure in Ireland in 2012. Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out on the Health Service Executive-Primary Care Reimbursement Service (HSE-PCRS) population prescribing database (n = 1,630,775). Three models were applied to test the association between annual expenditure per claimant whilst controlling for age, sex, region, and the pharmacology of the drugs as represented by the main ATC groups. Results: The mean annual cost per claimant was €751 (median = €211; SD = €1323.10; range = €3.27–€298,670). Age, sex, and regions were all significant contributory factors of expenditure, with gender having the greatest impact (β = 0.107). Those aged over 75 (β =1.195) were the greatest contributors to annual GMS prescribing costs. As regards regions, the South has the greatest cost increasing impact. When the ATC groups were included the impact of gender is diluted by the pharmacology of the products, with cardiovascular prescribing (ATC ‘C’) most influential (β = 1.229) and the explanatory power of the model increased from 40 % to 60 %. Conclusion: Whilst policies aimed at cost containment (co-payment charges; generic substitution; reference pricing; adjustments to GMS eligibility) can be used to curtail expenditure, health promotional programs and educational interventions should be given equal emphasis. Also policies intended to affect physicians’ prescribing behaviour include guidelines, information (about price and less expensive alternatives) and feedback, and the use of budgetary restrictions could yield savings in Ireland and can be easily translated to the international context.en
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.description.versionPublished Versionen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.articleid13en
dc.identifier.citationConwayLenihan, A., Ahern, S., Moore, S., Cronin, J. and Woods, N. (2016) 'Factors influencing the variation in GMS prescribing expenditure in Ireland', Health Economics Review, 6, 13 (8pp). doi: 10.1186/s13561-016-0090-xen
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13561-016-0090-xen
dc.identifier.eissn2191-1991
dc.identifier.endpage8en
dc.identifier.journaltitleHealth Economics Reviewen
dc.identifier.startpage1en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10468/13603
dc.identifier.volume6en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltden
dc.rights© 2016, ConwayLenihan et al. Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en
dc.subjectPrescription drug expendituresen
dc.subjectRegional variationen
dc.subjectClaimsen
dc.subjectCostsen
dc.subjectPredictabilityen
dc.subjectMedicationsen
dc.subjectIncreaseen
dc.titleFactors influencing the variation in GMS prescribing expenditure in Irelanden
dc.typeArticle (peer-reviewed)en
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
s13561-016-0090-x.pdf
Size:
526.86 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published Version
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: