Full text restriction information:Access to this article is restricted until 6 months after publication by request of the publisher.
Restriction lift date:2021-06-07
Citation:Bao, X. R., Pan, Y., Lee, C. M., Davis, T. H. and Bao, G. (2020) 'Tools for experimental and computational analyses of off-target editing by programmable nucleases', Nature Protocols, 16, pp. 10-26. doi: 10.1038/s41596-020-00431-y
Genome editing using programmable nucleases is revolutionizing life science and medicine. Off-target editing by these nucleases remains a considerable concern, especially in therapeutic applications. Here we review tools developed for identifying potential off-target editing sites and compare the ability of these tools to properly analyze off-target effects. Recent advances in both in silico and experimental tools for off-target analysis have generated remarkably concordant results for sites with high off-target editing activity. However, no single tool is able to accurately predict low-frequency off-target editing, presenting a bottleneck in therapeutic genome editing, because even a small number of cells with off-target editing can be detrimental. Therefore, we recommend that at least one in silico tool and one experimental tool should be used together to identify potential off-target sites, and amplicon-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) should be used as the gold standard assay for assessing the true off-target effects at these candidate sites. Future work to improve off-target analysis includes expanding the true off-target editing dataset to evaluate new experimental techniques and to train machine learning algorithms; performing analysis using the particular genome of the cells in question rather than the reference genome; and applying novel NGS techniques to improve the sensitivity of amplicon-based off-target editing quantification.Off-target effects of programmable nucleases remain a critical issue for therapeutic applications of genome editing. This review compares experimental and computational tools for off-target analysis and provides recommendations for better assessments of off-target effects.
This website uses cookies. By using this website, you consent to the use of cookies in accordance with the UCC Privacy and Cookies Statement. For more information about cookies and how you can disable them, visit our Privacy and Cookies statement