Step-count accuracy of three motion sensors for older and frail medical inpatients

Thumbnail Image
McCullagh, Ruth
Dillon, Christina B.
O'Connell, Ann Marie
Horgan, N. Frances
Timmons, Suzanne
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Elsevier B.V.
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Objectives: To measure the step-count accuracy of an ankle-worn accelerometer, a thigh-worn accelerometer and one pedometer in older and frail inpatients. Design: Cross-sectional design study. Setting: Research room within a hospital. Participants: Convenience sample of inpatients aged ≥65 years, able to walk 20 metres unassisted, with or without a walking-aid. Intervention: Patients completed a 40-minute programme of predetermined tasks while wearing the three motion sensors simultaneously. Video-recording of the procedure provided the criterion measurement of step-count. Main Outcome Measures: Mean percentage (%) errors were calculated for all tasks, slow versus fast walkers, independent versus walking-aid-users, and over shorter versus longer distances. The Intra-class Correlation was calculated and accuracy was visually displayed by Bland-Altman plots. Results: Thirty-two patients (78.1 ±7.8 years) completed the study. Fifteen were female and 17 used walking-aids. Their median speed was 0.46 m/sec (interquartile range, IQR 0.36-0.66). The ankle-worn accelerometer overestimated steps (median 1% error, IQR -3 to 13). The other motion sensors underestimated steps (40% error (IQR -51 to -35) and 38% (IQR -93 to -27), respectively). The ankle-worn accelerometer proved more accurate over longer distances (3% error, IQR 0 to 9), than shorter distances (10%, IQR -23 to 9). Conclusions: The ankle-worn accelerometer gave the most accurate step-count measurement and was most accurate over longer distances. Neither of the other motion sensors had acceptable margins of error.
Walking , Dimensional measurement accuracy , Frail , Elderly , In-patients
McCullagh, R., Dillon, C., O’Connell, A. M., Horgan, N. F. and Timmons, S. (2016) ‘Step-count accuracy of three motion sensors for older and frail medical inpatients’, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 98(2), pp. 295-302. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.08.476
Link to publisher’s version