A systematic review of methods to assess intake of sugar-sweetened beverages among healthy European adults and children: a DEDIPAC (DEterminants of DIet and Physical Activity) study

dc.check.date2017-10-21
dc.check.infoAccess to this article is restricted until 12 months after publication by the request of the publisher.en
dc.contributor.authorRiordan, Fiona
dc.contributor.authorRyan, Kathleen
dc.contributor.authorPerry, Ivan J.
dc.contributor.authorSchulze, Matthias B.
dc.contributor.authorAndersen, Lene Frost
dc.contributor.authorGeelen, Anouk
dc.contributor.authorVan't Veer, Pieter
dc.contributor.authorEussen, Simone
dc.contributor.authorvan Dongen, Martien
dc.contributor.authorWijckmans-Duysens, Nicole
dc.contributor.authorHarrington, Janas M.
dc.contributor.funderHealth Research Boarden
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-02T12:12:45Z
dc.date.available2016-11-02T12:12:45Z
dc.date.issued2016-10-21
dc.date.updated2016-10-25T15:54:31Z
dc.description.abstractResearch indicates that intake of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) may be associated with negative health consequences. However, differences between assessment methods can affect the comparability of intake data across studies. The current review aimed to identify methods used to assess SSB intake among children and adults in pan-European studies and to inform the development of the DEDIPAC (DEterminants of DIet and Physical Activity) toolbox of methods suitable for use in future European studies. A literature search was conducted using three electronic databases and by hand-searching reference lists. English-language studies of any design which assessed SSB consumption were included in the review. Studies involving two or more European countries were included in the review. Healthy, free-living children and adults. The review identified twenty-three pan-European studies which assessed intake of SSB. The FFQ was the most commonly used (n 24), followed by the 24 h recall (n 6) and diet records (n 1). There were several differences between the identified FFQ, including the definition of SSB used. In total, seven instruments that were tested for validity were selected as potentially suitable to assess SSB intake among adults (n 1), adolescents (n 3) and children (n 3). The current review highlights the need for instruments to use an agreed definition of SSB. Methods that were tested for validity and used in pan-European populations encompassing a range of countries were identified. These methods should be considered for use by future studies focused on evaluating consumption of SSB.en
dc.description.sponsorshipHealth Research Board (DEDIPAC/2013/1)en
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.description.versionPublished Versionen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.citationRiordan, F., Ryan, K., Perry, I.J., Schulze, M. B., Andersen, L. F., Geelen, A., van’t Veer, P., Eussen, S., van Dongen, M., Wijckmans-Duysens, N. and Harrington, J. M. (2016) ‘A systematic review of methods to assess intake of sugar-sweetened beverages among healthy European adults and children: a DEDIPAC (DEterminants of DIet and Physical Activity) study’, Public Health Nutrition, 20(4), pp. 578-597. doi: 10.1017/S1368980016002639en
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S1368980016002639
dc.identifier.endpage597
dc.identifier.issn1475-2727
dc.identifier.issued4
dc.identifier.journaltitlePublic health nutritionen
dc.identifier.startpage578
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10468/3233
dc.identifier.volume20
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressen
dc.relation.urihttps://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/public-health-nutrition
dc.rights© The Authors 2016 en
dc.subjectSugar-sweetened beveragesen
dc.subjectDietary assessmenten
dc.subjectEuropeen
dc.subjectDEDIPACen
dc.titleA systematic review of methods to assess intake of sugar-sweetened beverages among healthy European adults and children: a DEDIPAC (DEterminants of DIet and Physical Activity) studyen
dc.typeArticle (peer-reviewed)en
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1518.pdf
Size:
394.63 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published Version
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: