Comparing approaches to optimize cut-off scores for short cognitive screening instruments in mild cognitive impairment and dementia

dc.contributor.authorO'Caoimh, Rónán
dc.contributor.authorGao, Yang
dc.contributor.authorSvendovski, Anton
dc.contributor.authorGallagher, Paul F.
dc.contributor.authorEustace, Joseph A.
dc.contributor.authorMolloy, D. William
dc.contributor.funderCanadian Institutes of Health Research
dc.contributor.funderAtlantic Philanthropies
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-02T10:16:26Z
dc.date.available2018-05-02T10:16:26Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractBackground: Although required to improve the usability of cognitive screening instruments (CSIs), the use of cut-off scores is controversial yet poorly researched. Objective: To explore cut-off scores for two short CSIs: the Standardized Mini-Mental State Examination (SMMSE) and Quick Mild Cognitive Impairment (Qmci) screen, describing adjustments in scores for diagnosis (MCI or dementia), age (<=, > 75 years), and education (<, >= 12 years), comparing two methods: the maximal accuracy approach, derived from receiver operating characteristic curves, and Youden's Index. Methods: Pooled analysis of assessments from patients attending memory clinics in Canada between 1999-2010 : 766 with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and 1,746 with dementia, and 875 normal controls. Results: The Qmci was more accurate than the SMMSE in differentiating controls from MCI or cognitive impairment (MCI and dementia). Employing the maximal accuracy approach, the optimal SMMSE cut-off for cognitive impairment was < 28/30 (AUC 0.86, sensitivity 74%, specificity 88%) versus < 63/100 for the Qmci (AUC 0.93, sensitivity 85%, specificity 85%). Using Youden's Index, the optimal SMMSE cut-off remained < 28/30 but fell slightly to < 62/100 for the Qmci (sensitivity 83%, specificity 87%). The optimal cut-off for MCI was < 29/30 for the SMMSE and < 67/100 for the Qmci, irrespective of technique. The maximal accuracy approach generally produced higher Qmci cut-offs than Youden's Index, both requiring adjustment for age and education. There were no clinically meaningful differences in SMMSE cut- off scores by age and education or method employed. Conclusion: Caution should be exercised selecting cut-offs as these differ by age, education, and method of derivation, with the extent of adjustment varying between CSIs.en
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.description.versionPublished Versionen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.citationO’Caoimh, R., Gao, Y., Svendovski, A., Gallagher, P., Eustace, J. and Molloy, D. W. (2017) 'Comparing approaches to optimize cut-off scores for short cognitive screening instruments in mild cognitive impairment and dementia', Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, 57, pp. 123-133. doi: 10.3233/JAD-161204en
dc.identifier.doi10.3233/JAD-161204
dc.identifier.endpage133
dc.identifier.issn1387-2877
dc.identifier.issued1
dc.identifier.journaltitleJournal of Alzheimer's Diseaseen
dc.identifier.startpage123
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10468/5944
dc.identifier.volume57
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherIOS Pressen
dc.relation.urihttps://content.iospress.com/articles/journal-of-alzheimers-disease/jad161204
dc.rights© 2017, IOS Press and the authors. All rights reserved This article is published online with Open Access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (CC BY-NC 4.0).en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.subjectCognitive screeningen
dc.subjectCut-offsen
dc.subjectDementiaen
dc.subjectMild cognitive impairmenten
dc.subjectQuick mild cognitive impairment screenen
dc.subjectStandardized mini-mental state examinationen
dc.titleComparing approaches to optimize cut-off scores for short cognitive screening instruments in mild cognitive impairment and dementiaen
dc.typeArticle (peer-reviewed)en
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
5246.pdf
Size:
437.31 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published Version
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
5246-1.docx
Size:
165.08 KB
Format:
Microsoft Word XML
Description:
Supplemental File 1