Evolution of 3D printing methods and materials for electrochemical energy storage

dc.check.date2021-06-08
dc.check.infoAccess to this article is restricted until 12 months after publication by request of the publisher.en
dc.contributor.authorEgorov, Vladimir
dc.contributor.authorGulzar, Umair
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Yan
dc.contributor.authorBreen, Siobhán
dc.contributor.authorO'Dwyer, Colm
dc.contributor.funderIrish Research Councilen
dc.contributor.funderHorizon 2020en
dc.contributor.funderScience Foundation Irelanden
dc.contributor.funderEnterprise Irelanden
dc.contributor.funderEuropean Regional Development Funden
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-07T09:03:31Z
dc.date.available2020-08-07T09:03:31Z
dc.date.issued2020-06-08
dc.date.updated2020-08-07T08:33:52Z
dc.description.abstractAdditive manufacturing has revolutionized the building of materials, and 3D-printing has become a useful tool for complex electrode assembly for batteries and supercapacitors. The field initially grew from extrusion-based methods and quickly evolved to photopolymerization printing, while supercapacitor technologies less sensitive to solvents more often involved material jetting processes. The need to develop higher-resolution multimaterial printers is borne out in the performance data of recent 3D printed electrochemical energy storage devices. Underpinning every part of a 3D-printable battery are the printing method and the feed material. These influence material purity, printing fidelity, accuracy, complexity, and the ability to form conductive, ceramic, or solvent-stable materials. The future of 3D-printable batteries and electrochemical energy storage devices is reliant on materials and printing methods that are co-operatively informed by device design. Herein, the material and method requirements in 3D-printable batteries and supercapacitors are addressed and requirements for the future of the field are outlined by linking existing performance limitations to requirements for printable energy-storage materials, casings, and direct printing of electrodes and electrolytes. A guide to materials and printing method choice best suited for alternative-form-factor energy-storage devices to be designed and integrated into the devices they power is thus provided.en
dc.description.sponsorshipScience Foundation Ireland (17/TIDA/4996); Irish Research Council (Grant Number: IRCLA/2019/118); Enterprise Ireland (Commercialisation Fund); European Regional Development Fund (Grant Number: CF‐2018‐0839‐P)en
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.description.versionAccepted Versionen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.articleid2000556en
dc.identifier.citationEgorov, V., Gulzar, U., Zhang, Y., Breen, S. and O'Dwyer, C. (2020) 'Evolution of 3D printing methods and materials for electrochemical energy storage', Advanced Materials, 32(29), 2000556 (27pp). doi: 10.1002/adma.202000556en
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/adma.202000556en
dc.identifier.eissn1521-4095
dc.identifier.endpage27en
dc.identifier.issn0935-9648
dc.identifier.issued29en
dc.identifier.journaltitleAdvanced Materialsen
dc.identifier.startpage1en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10468/10363
dc.identifier.volume32en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Inc.en
dc.relation.projectinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020::RIA/825114/EU/Smart Autonomous Multi Modal Sensors for Vital Signs Monitoring/SmartVistaen
dc.relation.projectinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/SFI/SFI Technology and Innovation Development Award (TIDA)/15/TIDA/2893/IE/Advanced Battery Materials for High Volumetric Energy Density Li-ion Batteries for Remote Off-Grid Power/en
dc.relation.projectinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/SFI/SFI Investigator Programme/14/IA/2581/IE/Diffractive optics and photonic probes for efficient mouldable 3D printed battery skin materials for portable electronic devices/en
dc.relation.projectinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/SFI/SFI Research Centres/12/RC/2278/IE/Advanced Materials and BioEngineering Research Centre (AMBER)/en
dc.rights© 2020, WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Egorov, V., Gulzar, U., Zhang, Y., Breen, S. and O'Dwyer, C. (2020) 'Evolution of 3D printing methods and materials for electrochemical energy storage', Advanced Materials, 32(29), 2000556 (27pp), doi: 10.1002/adma.202000556, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202000556. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions.en
dc.subject3D printingen
dc.subjectAdditive manufacturingen
dc.subjectBatteriesen
dc.subjectEnergy storage devicesen
dc.subjectSupercapacitorsen
dc.titleEvolution of 3D printing methods and materials for electrochemical energy storageen
dc.typeArticle (peer-reviewed)en
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
3D_printing_battery_review-final-revised_-_clean.pdf
Size:
2.87 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Accepted Version
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: