16S rRNA gene sequencing of mock microbial populations-impact of DNA extraction method, primer choice and sequencing platform

dc.contributor.authorFouhy, Fiona
dc.contributor.authorClooney, Adam G.
dc.contributor.authorStanton, Catherine
dc.contributor.authorClaesson, Marcus J.
dc.contributor.authorCotter, Paul D.
dc.contributor.funderSeventh Framework Programme
dc.contributor.funderScience Foundation Ireland
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-21T11:01:24Z
dc.date.available2017-06-21T11:01:24Z
dc.date.issued2016-06-24
dc.description.abstractBackground: Next-generation sequencing platforms have revolutionised our ability to investigate the microbiota composition of complex environments, frequently through 16S rRNA gene sequencing of the bacterial component of the community. Numerous factors, including DNA extraction method, primer sequences and sequencing platform employed, can affect the accuracy of the results achieved. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of these three factors on 16S rRNA gene sequencing results, using mock communities and mock community DNA. Results: The use of different primer sequences (V4-V5, V1-V2 and V1-V2 degenerate primers) resulted in differences in the genera and species detected. The V4-V5 primers gave the most comparable results across platforms. The three Ion PGM primer sets detected more of the 20 mock community species than the equivalent MiSeq primer sets. Data generated from DNA extracted using the 2 extraction methods were very similar. Conclusions: Microbiota compositional data differed depending on the primers and sequencing platform that were used. The results demonstrate the risks in comparing data generated using different sequencing approaches and highlight the merits of choosing a standardised approach for sequencing in situations where a comparison across multiple sequencing runs is required.en
dc.description.sponsorshipScience Foundation Ireland (Grant Numbers SFI/12/RC/2273; 11/PI/1137)en
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.description.versionPublished Versionen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.articleid123
dc.identifier.citationFouhy, F., Clooney, A. G., Stanton, C., Claesson, M. J. and Cotter, P. D. (2016) '16S rRNA gene sequencing of mock microbial populations- impact of DNA extraction method, primer choice and sequencing platform', BMC Microbiology, 16, 123 (13pp). doi: 10.1186/s12866-016-0738-zen
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12866-016-0738-z
dc.identifier.endpage13
dc.identifier.issn1471-2180
dc.identifier.journaltitleBMC Microbiologyen
dc.identifier.startpage1
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10468/4126
dc.identifier.volume16
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen
dc.relation.projectinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7::SP1::HEALTH/603038/EU/Cystic Fibrosis Microbiome-determined Antibiotic Therapy Trial in Exacerbations: Results Stratified./CFMATTERS
dc.relation.urihttps://bmcmicrobiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12866-016-0738-z
dc.rights© 2016, the Author(s). Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.en
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en
dc.subjectNext-generation sequencingen
dc.subjectMock communitiesen
dc.subject16S rRNAen
dc.subjectMiSeqen
dc.subjectIon PGMen
dc.subjectGut microbiotaen
dc.subjectBiasen
dc.subjectDNA extractionen
dc.title16S rRNA gene sequencing of mock microbial populations-impact of DNA extraction method, primer choice and sequencing platformen
dc.typeArticle (peer-reviewed)en
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2999.pdf
Size:
1.97 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published Version
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2999-1.docx
Size:
21.57 KB
Format:
Microsoft Word XML
Description:
Supplementary File 1