Exploring sex, gender, and gender-related sociocultural factors in clinical decision-making for older adults using a prescribing cascade vignette: A transnational qualitative study

Thumbnail Image
Files
Date
2024-11-27
Authors
Kthupi, Altea
Rochon, Paula A.
Santini, Sara
Paoletti, Luca
Mason, Robin
McCarthy, Lisa M.
Carrieri, Barbara
Dalton, Kieran
Li, Joyce
Sivayoganathan, Kawsika
Show 10 more
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Springer Nature
Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-024-01158-1
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Abstract
Background: Despite growing awareness of sex differences in inappropriate prescribing among older adults, including the initiation of problematic prescribing cascades, the impact of gender bias remains largely unexplored. Objectives: We explored how a patient’s sex and gender-related sociocultural factors influence physicians’ prescribing decisions, potentially leading to prescribing cascades in older adults. A secondary objective was to explore whether and how physician sex affected prescribing decisions for female and male patients. Methods: Physicians in Canada and Italy were presented with a clinical vignette describing an older male or female patient on amlodipine presenting with peripheral edema. Physicians were interviewed using the ‘think-aloud’ method to describe their treatment considerations. Thematic multi-site analysis was used to analyze the data. Results: Of 30 physicians, only two considered prescribing a diuretic for an older female patient. Most physicians identified amlodipine as the cause of the edema and adjusted or substituted the medication, often making these treatment decisions without considering sex- and gender-related sociocultural factors. When prompted, physicians acknowledged the relevance of these factors, but their responses varied. Some adapted their treatment plans, noting the challenges of managing edema, particularly for female patients, whereas others did not incorporate these considerations. Interestingly, some physicians adjusted their plans based on gender-related factors yet still stated that gender did not influence their treatment decisions. No variations in treatment decisions based on physician sex were observed. Conclusion: The study reveals a gap between physicians’ recognition of gender-related sociocultural factors and their consistent integration into clinical decision-making, highlighting the need for more nuanced approaches in prescribing practices.
Description
Keywords
Gender-related sociocultural factors , Sex differences , Inappropriate prescribing , Problematic prescribing cascades
Citation
Kthupi, A., Rochon, P. A., Santini, S., Paoletti, L., Mason, R., McCarthy, L. M., Carrieri, B., Dalton, K., Li, J., Sivayoganathan, K. and Borhani, P. (2024) 'Exploring sex, gender, and gender-related sociocultural factors in clinical decision-making for older adults using a prescribing cascade vignette: A transnational qualitative study', Drugs & Aging, 41, pp 977-988. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-024-01158-1
Link to publisher’s version
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/10468/16739
Collections
Pharmacy - Journal Articles
Copyright
© 2024, the Authors, under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG. This version of the paper has been accepted for publication, after peer review (when applicable) and is subject to Springer Nature’s AM terms of use, but is not the Version of Record and does not reflect post-acceptance improvements, or any corrections. The Version of Record is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-024-01158-1