Debriefing works: Successful retraction of misinformation following a fake news study
Loading...
Files
Published version
Supporting information
Date
2023-01-20
Authors
Greene, Ciara M.
Murphy, Gillian
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
PLOS
Published Version
Abstract
In recent years there has been an explosion of research on misinformation, often involving experiments where participants are presented with fake news stories and subsequently debriefed. In order to avoid potential harm to participants or society, it is imperative that we establish whether debriefing procedures remove any lasting influence of misinformation. In the current study, we followed up with 1547 participants one week after they had been exposed to fake news stories about COVID-19 and then provided with a detailed debriefing. False memories and beliefs for previously-seen fake stories declined from the original study, suggesting that the debrief was effective. Moreover, the debriefing resulted in reduced false memories and beliefs for novel fake stories, suggesting a broader impact on participants’ willingness to accept misinformation. Small effects of misinformation on planned health behaviours observed in the original study were also eliminated at follow-up. Our findings suggest that when a careful and thorough debriefing procedure is followed, researchers can safely and ethically conduct misinformation research on sensitive topics.
Description
Keywords
False memories , COVID 19 , Behavioral and social aspects of health , Pandemics , Vaccines , Research ethics , Vaccine development , Scientific misconduct
Citation
Greene, C.M. and Murphy, G. (2023) ‘Debriefing works: Successful retraction of misinformation following a fake news study’, PLOS ONE, 18(1), e0280295 (19 pp). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280295