Self-reported feedback in ICT-delivered aphasia rehabilitation: a literature review

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Kearns, Áine
dc.contributor.author Kelly, Helen
dc.contributor.author Pitt, Ian
dc.date.accessioned 2019-09-13T11:37:19Z
dc.date.available 2019-09-13T11:37:19Z
dc.date.issued 2019-09-05
dc.identifier.citation Kearns, Á., Kelly, H. and Pitt, I. (2019) 'Self-reported feedback in ICT-delivered aphasia rehabilitation: a literature review', Disability and Rehabilitation, pp. 1-15. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1655803 en
dc.identifier.startpage 1 en
dc.identifier.endpage 15 en
dc.identifier.issn 0963-8288
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10468/8529
dc.identifier.doi 10.1080/09638288.2019.1655803 en
dc.description.abstract Purpose: Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) can provide an option for the delivery of intensive aphasia rehabilitation but the users’ views (i.e., People with Aphasia) must be considered to ensure satisfaction, motivation and adherence with this mode of rehabilitation. The aim of this literature review is to provide a critical overview of studies where feedback was elicited from participants about their experiences with ICT-delivered aphasia rehabilitation. Methods: A systematic search using six electronic databases was conducted in July 2015 and updated in May 2019. Studies of synchronous telerehabilitation and interventions targeting compensatory strategies were excluded from the review. Studies retrieved were screened for eligibility and information was extracted on the characteristics of each study, methods of data collection and study outcomes. Results: Seventeen studies met the inclusion criteria including studies with quantitative, qualitative and mixed-methods research designs. The studies employed a variety of data collection methods, examining a number of ICT-delivered aphasia rehabilitation activities and the findings investigated aspects of feasibility, usability and acceptance of this mode of rehabilitation. Conclusions: The findings indicate ICT-delivered aphasia rehabilitation is considered an acceptable mode of rehabilitation by people with aphasia who reported generally positive feedback, though variation among personal perspectives and experience is noted. There is currently no consensus measure of self-reported feedback in ICT-delivered aphasia rehabilitation. en
dc.description.sponsorship Health Research Board (Health Professionals Fellowship Grant 2016) en
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf en
dc.language.iso en en
dc.publisher Taylor & Francis Group en
dc.rights © 2019, Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Disability and Rehabilitation on 5 September 2019, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/09638288.2019.1655803 en
dc.subject Aphasia en
dc.subject Rehabilitation en
dc.subject Information and Communication Technology en
dc.subject Self-reported feedback en
dc.title Self-reported feedback in ICT-delivered aphasia rehabilitation: a literature review en
dc.type Article (peer-reviewed) en
dc.internal.authorcontactother Helen Kelly, Speech And Hearing Sciences, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland. +353-21-490-3000 Email: helen.kelly@ucc.ie en
dc.internal.availability Full text available en
dc.check.info Access to this article is restricted until 12 months after publication by request of the publisher. en
dc.check.date 2020-09-05
dc.date.updated 2019-09-13T11:23:17Z
dc.description.version Accepted Version en
dc.internal.rssid 499774920
dc.contributor.funder Health Research Board en
dc.description.status Peer reviewed en
dc.identifier.journaltitle Disability and Rehabilitation en
dc.internal.copyrightchecked Yes
dc.internal.licenseacceptance Yes en
dc.internal.IRISemailaddress helen.kelly@ucc.ie en
dc.internal.bibliocheck Latest Articles. Check vol / issue / page range. Amend citation as necessary. en
dc.identifier.eissn 1464-5165


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This website uses cookies. By using this website, you consent to the use of cookies in accordance with the UCC Privacy and Cookies Statement. For more information about cookies and how you can disable them, visit our Privacy and Cookies statement